[ETC（以太坊经典）]ETC 工作量证明课程：18. POW 区块链将永远受到持续的社会攻击

您可以在此处收听或观看此视频

在上一课中，第 17 课，我们解释了比特币和以太坊经典 (ETC) 等工作量证明 (POW) 区块链如何进行权力划分，而权益证明 (POS) 链则没有。

我们看到，在引入邪恶规则或争议的情况下，“分裂权”或分离权如何为这些系统提供更高级别的安全性。

在本课程 18 的相关主题中，我们将了解为什么 POW 区块链总是会受到持续的社会攻击，因为在真正去中心化的系统中，没有更高的权威来施加命令。

在技​​术讨论或升级争议中，各派必须为自己想要的结果而战。

此外，精英和政府并不认同真正的权力下放。

因此，毒性和极端主义是捍卫这些系统原则的必要姿态。

真正去中心化的系统永远不会中心化

工作量证明是唯一能够实现真正去中心化的信号系统。

在社会群体中，如果可以在不破坏系统的情况下实现去中心化，那么自由参与者总是会选择去中心化。

集中化并不是人们所希望的状态。

“投票”、“民主”和“共和”都不是理想的制度，它们只是我们能做的最不糟糕的事情。

但在工作证明系统中不能有暴君、国王、宪法、总统或国会。

它们是不可能的，因为参与者永远不会选择它们，因为它们没有必要，而且他们总是更愿意分裂。

工作证明非治理

工作证明区块链实际上在没有治理的情况下工作得更好。

在这些系统中，“宪法”是区块链协议本身。

以比特币为例，矿工通过按照规则构建区块来赚取比特币，这是推动整个行业在全球范围内完全去中心化的组织原则。

在以太坊经典中，它是可编程且无需许可的，这一事实指导世界各地的开发人员在其上构建应用程序，遵循分布式 EVM 设计，并自然地激励他们捍卫它。

这就是为什么在 POW 区块链中没有领导者或管理员强加他们的意愿。

正是系统的价值和激励引导着全球生态走向去中心化。

真正的去中心化意味着没有权威

在真正去中心化的背景下，没有仲裁者或权威来施加秩序。

如果没有父辈人物或管理员在区块链中强加秩序，那么在改变规则或实施升级时，各派系必须为他们想要的结果而奋斗。

因此，在这种情况下不可能进行“文明辩论”。

It is more or less like when children are with their parents or not. If their parents are present, then they will be much better behaved, but when the parents leave, then they may fight over candy or a sibling may pull the hair of the other.

Genuine decentralization means no authority, and no authority means that brute argumentative force becomes the name of the game.

No Authority Must Lead to Toxicity

If brute argumentative force becomes the name of the game to defend the principles of these systems, then the so called “toxicity” must be necessary.

Consequently, all those who criticize toxicity because it hurts their feelings are wrong.

Toxicity and maximalism are actually rational game-theoretical and evolutionarily stable behaviors in decentralized systems.

If toxicity is absent during periods of peace, and the factions seem to dissolve, it is not because they failed. It is because they were temporarily not needed.

But when new threats emerge again, which is inevitable, then, the toxic maximalists will re-emerge as well and will be welcomed as heroes.

Toxicity is good for POW blockchains.

The Proof of Stake Non-Toxicity Fallacy

Because proof of stake (POS) is centralized, then there are no social attacks on it.

Indeed, in POS participants can’t even split! Therefore, there is no argument to be had other than submitting to the authorities.

This is why so many people find POS “communities” so pleasant, because they seem friendly and inviting. But this is because they are after your money and they deceive you.

Although they may seem non-toxic in the surface, the evil in the systems is their centralization.

They control you, they submit you, and you have no recourse but to comply.

The perversion is orders of magnitude worse than the harmless “toxicity” in POW.

How BlackRock Will Be Neutralized

Many have cheered and welcomed the participation of the global asset management giant BlackRock in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Soon this globalist and passionate “Environmental, Social, and Governance” behemoth will also make incursions in other networks such as Ethereum, and eventually ETC.

Being BlackRock a faithful representative of elite philosophy and government power, it is inexorable that they will try to change the rules of these systems to centralize them.

However, because of the reasons explained in this and previous classes, POW blockchains are well equipped to defend their principles and integrity in front of these threats.

Toxicity will certainly push back at their attacks, and things such as the “right to split” and the sheer protection barrier that is POW will defend them.

Thank you for reading this article!

To learn more about ETC please go to: https://ethereumclassic.org

热点：ETC 以太 以太坊 区块链 POW